Paleontica Community

Hey,

the tooth is a upper postero-lateral Notorynchus.

It´s broken, that is the reason why it is so small.

The little cusp next to main cusp might though be seen as a small pathology.

Gr


Stephsn

Hey,

nice teeth. I like them too, as you see;D

Best regards


Stephan

Hey, lately I got a hell lot of new teeth, and it costed both money and space. Thus it´s time again for me for a little bit of filtering. I have sorted out quite a lot of teeth that stayed in my collection for a long time already. There are some more common and some rarer teeth in between, in both ...

Hey,
nice idea!
if there are 2 spots empty on the 11th, I´d be pleased.


Gr

Stephan

PS: If you want really good beer, I could bring some from Germany;)

[Bewerkt door Steph op 25-03-2009 om 20:04 NL]

thanks for your reaction;)
You are indeed right with your determinations!

I already forgot this topic, 1 year for 1 reaction, that´s pretty good. I gave up writing in the English part of the forum anyway...

Best regards

Stephan

You´ve got mail...

Btw, the tooth looks typically like one from Chile ( for example look at buriedtreasurefossils.com ). However, what is strange is what I find to identify as serrations on the main cusp. Never seen that on a symphy before.

Best regards


Stephan

Hey, this now is definitely a symphysaire tooth, and if this is no pathology, i really, i really don´t know what a pathology should be. Well done! I think you can even say it is most probably hexanchus... This is also a very nice tooth for comparison, so if you´d like to trade it for some "lar...

Hey!
What do you offer, what do you want?


Best regards

Stephan

binbinneke schreef:
It doesn't necessarily mean the tooth is broken in any way.

Though it is, at least in my opinion. For me both root sides are broken away and afterwords roled...

Other opinions?

For me a usuall rolled Galeocerdo.


@Galeocerdo: at least he´s succesful at what he´s collecting...